check_circle Done

Government Government

Give local government greater control over the money they raise

Last updated: 12:31pm 29 October 2019

We will continue to give local government greater control over the money they raise…

Conservative Party Manifesto 2017, p.32

Our verdict

Local authorities receive funding from a range of sources, including Government grants, council tax, fees and charges.  The majority of this income is derived from council tax and business rates. Central government has a significant degree of control over these two revenue streams, and sets the policy framework in which both operate. In 2013–14, the government introduced the BRRS (Business Rates Retention Scheme), allowing local authorities to retain 50% of real-terms changes in business rates revenues. This is a pledge to continue to provide local government greater control over the money they raise.

In December 2017, the government piloted 100% Business Rates Retention in a number of areas of England. Following this, in September 2018, the executive launched another set of pilots, to test 75% Business Rates Retention until 2019-20. Following the pilots, in December 2018 the government started a round of consultations on Business Rates Return reform. The feedback, currently under analysis, is expected to sit alongside a larger reform of local finances due in 2020.

In February 2018, the government extended the Capital Receipts Flexibility programme to 2020. This gives local authorities the freedom to use money they have gained from the sale of their assets.

The government’s finance settlement for 2018 to 2019 projects an increase in available local government resources from £44.3 billion in 2017-18 to £45.6 billion in 2019-20.

With steps such as the BRRS trials, consultations for general reform, and the Capital Receipts Flexibility extension, we can see a continuation of policies to increase the financial autonomy of local government. So, we consider this policy ‘done’. We’ll keep tracking financial arrangements for local authorities until the government’s term has ended, and update our verdict if necessary.

Want to know more?

There's always room for debate

We’re serious about providing clear, up-to-date, non-partisan information. We focus on being consistent and fair in how we reach our verdicts, and always explain our reasoning. But there is always room for debate. So if you see it differently, we’d love you to tell us why. Or even better, submit an edit.