Consult widely on the design of the UK Shared Prosperity Fund
Last updated: 04:28pm 19 January 2019
Conservative Party Manifesto 2017, p.35
We will consult widely on the design of the fund, including with the devolved administrations, local authorities, businesses and public bodies.
The “fund” that the manifesto wording refers to is the UK Shared Prosperity Fund – the government’s replacement for the European Structural Investment Funds after we leave the EU. The European Structural Investment Funds (ESIF) can be allocated to any region across the EU, but are designed to promote social and economic development in the areas that need them most.
It is estimated that the UK was allocated €16 billion (about £14 billion) for the period 2014-2020. So this is a big deal for many areas of the UK.
Although there has been some discussion on this policy, it’s been from local government bodies like the Local Government Association and the Greater London Authority who are understandably keen to ensure they are ready when the government’s consultation on the Shared Prosperity Fund starts.
The fund itself, however, is being developed by the Department for Communities and Local Government. So far they have only promised that the consultation process would launch in 2018, but that didn’t happen.
The policy we’re tracking here isn’t about creating the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (that’s this policy), it’s about ensuring they “consult widely on the design of the fund” when they create it. Given the consultation hasn’t been launched yet, we’re marking this policy ‘not started’. When it does launch, we’ll be assessing the consultation process and including feedback from organisations and bodies with an interest in the how the fund is developed. Follow this policy for updates.
Love the detail?
- European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) – Gov.uk
- How much do the regions of the UK receive in EU funding? – Full Fact
- Create a UK Shared Prosperity Fund
- Ensure the Shared Prosperity Fund is cheap to administer
- Ensure the Shared Prosperity Fund is low in bureaucracy
- Ensure the Shared Prosperity Fund is targeted where it is needed most
- Deliver sustainable growth from the Shared Prosperity Fund
There's always room for debate
We’re serious about providing clear, up-to-date, non-partisan information. We focus on being consistent and fair in how we reach our verdicts, and always explain our reasoning. But there is always room for debate. So if you see it differently, we’d love you to tell us why. Or even better, submit an edit.