Double support for sports in primary schools
Last updated: 09:20am 11 January 2019
Conservative Party Manifesto 2017, p.72
We shall continue to support school sport, delivering on our commitment to double support for sports in primary schools.
This policy sits alongside the government’s commitment to “take action to reduce childhood obesity“. That commitment exists partly because official figures indicate that “60% more children in their last year of primary school are classified as “severely obese” than in their first year”. In 2017, a report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) showed the UK to be the most obese country in western Europe, a status that brings with it great social and economic costs, as explained in the government’s childhood obesity plan.
By doubling the support for sports in primary schools the government hopes to promote fitness and healthier lifestyles, and since the election it has delivered on this funding promise.
Primary schools receive a Physical Education (PE) and sport premium based on the number of pupils in years 1-6. In 2016-2017 schools with 17 or more students received £8000 as well as £5 per pupil. Meanwhile, schools with 16 or fewer eligible students received £500 per pupil.
However, this changed for the academic year 2017-2018, and the changes have been maintained into 2018-2019. The funding doubled, with schools with 17 or more pupils receiving £16,000 as well as £10 per pupil. And schools with 16 or fewer eligible students now receive £1000 per pupil.
Based on the changes to the level of PE and sport premium funding, we can safely give this policy promise a verdict of ‘done’.
- Childhood obesity: a plan for action – Gov.uk
- Child obesity: Are 22,000 children ‘severely obese’? – BBC
- Health at a Glance 2017 – OECD
- PE and sport premium for primary schools – Gov.uk
There's always room for debate
We’re serious about providing clear, up-to-date, non-partisan information. We focus on being consistent and fair in how we reach our verdicts, and always explain our reasoning. But there is always room for debate. So if you see it differently, we’d love you to tell us why. Or even better, submit an edit.