broken_image Broken

Crime Crime

Incorporate the Serious Fraud Office into the National Crime Agency

Last updated: 10:29pm 15 December 2018

We will strengthen Britain’s response to white collar crime by incorporating the Serious Fraud Office into the National Crime Agency, improving intelligence sharing and bolstering the investigation of serious fraud, money laundering and financial crime.

Conservative Party Manifesto 2017, p.44

Our verdict

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) was created in 1988, and describes itself as:

“a specialist prosecuting authority tackling the top level of serious or complex fraud, bribery and corruption”

As long ago as 2011, when she was Home Secretary, Theresa May made clear her desire to dismantle the SFO, in spite of resistance from cabinet colleagues. Back then, her argument was that police and special investigators were better suited than lawyers to investigate the types of crimes being handled by the SFO.

With this policy, the government announced its intention to follow through on the Prime Minister’s long-held belief that the SFO is an agency that should not exist in its own right.

However, the government has not proceeded with the plan as it intended. In October 2017, a Home Office minister avoided giving an affirmative answer to a straightforward question about whether the planned merger of the SFO with the National Crime Agency (NCA) was going ahead.

Then, in December 2017, the government announced a plan to establish a new National Economic Crime Centre within the NCA to target crimes such as fraud, bribery, corruption and money laundering. Buried in the announcement was a reversal of the policy of “incorporating” the SFO into the NCA:

“The SFO will continue to act as an independent organisation…”

Its relationship with the new National Economic Crime Centre does have implications for the way the SFO operates, but the government has shelved the idea of incorporating the SFO into the NCA, so we’re marking this one as ‘broken’.

Love the detail?

There's always room for debate

We’re serious about providing clear, up-to-date, non-partisan information. We focus on being consistent and fair in how we reach our verdicts, and always explain our reasoning. But there is always room for debate. So if you see it differently, we’d love you to tell us why. Or even better, submit an edit.