check_circle Done

Society and Culture Society and Culture

Introduce new protections for minors

Last updated: 12:23pm 18 January 2019

We will work with industry to introduce new protections for minors, from images of pornography, violence, and other age-inappropriate content not just on social media but in app stores and content sites as well.

Conservative Party Manifesto 2017, p.79

Our verdict

Recent figures show 90% of UK adults are internet users in 2018, with that figure rising to almost complete saturation, 99%, among 16 to 34-year-olds. As with all technology, the internet can be used for good or ill. The dangers for children online include the risk of bullying, child sexual abuse, and trafficking, amongst many others.

This policy is a promise to try to protect children from harm when they are online, specifically by preventing them from viewing age-inappropriate material.

This issue is addressed in several related policy verdicts (see below). In those verdicts, we point to:

The Data Protection Act 2018 in particular contains various provisions to enhance children’s safety online.

As well as those initiatives, in July 2018, the government announced that it was expanding the scope of the UK Council for Child Internet Safety (UKCCIS) to create a UK Council for Internet Safety (UKCIS). Priority areas of focus for the new body are said to “include online harms experienced by children”.

The government is also planning to introduce age verification requirements for online pornography websites at some point in 2019.

The combined effect of actions under the related policies mentioned above, the new UKCIS specifically focusing on children, and the planned introduction of age verification for pornography sites are all evidence of the protections for minors promised by this policy. The promise is not more specific than saying “new protections” so for this reason we’re calling this one ‘done’. Follow this policy to keep up to date with any changes.

Want the details?

Related policies

There's always room for debate

We’re serious about providing clear, up-to-date, non-partisan information. We focus on being consistent and fair in how we reach our verdicts, and always explain our reasoning. But there is always room for debate. So if you see it differently, we’d love you to tell us why. Or even better, submit an edit.