This site is in beta mode while we add the remaining policies. To feedback or help, please get in touch!
In Progress
Make British troops subject to the Law of Armed Conflict

Under a Conservative government, British troops will in future be subject to the Law of Armed Conflict, which includes the Geneva Convention and UK Service Law, not the European Court of Human Rights.

Our Verdict

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is an international treaty with 47 signatories designed to protect human rights and political freedoms. It was incorporated into UK law under the Human Rights Act (HRA) in 1998, bringing the UK under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

The Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) refers to a set of rules which seek, for humanitarian reasons, to limit the effects of armed conflict. The LOAC does not grant authority to the ECtHR.

In 2016, the previous government announced its intention to prevent the ECHR leading to what it called “false charges against our troops on an industrial scale”. The argument made by ministers was that an industry had sprung up to pursue “vexatious claims” against soldiers and that the way to prevent this was to “derogate” from (not conform to) certain articles in the ECHR.

This policy promises to follow through on the proposed “presumption to derogate” announced by the previous government.

As things stand the UK is still bound by the requirements of the ECHR. Prior to June 2017, the Joint Committee on Human Rights was conducting an inquiry into the proposed derogation, but it was not reconvened following the election. Several submissions to the inquiry challenged the legal basis and viability of the proposal.

An additional hurdle to implementation is that the EU has indicated that any security cooperation following Brexit is conditional on the UK remaining under ECtHR jurisdiction.

As with many policies, the outcome of Brexit negotiations is likely to impact on fulfilment of this pledge. For now, we’re marking it as ‘in progress’ rather than ‘not started’ because derogation is only required during an armed conflict, and also due to the ongoing Brexit negotiations. We’ll be monitoring the outcome of those negotiations and their impact on the UK’s relationship to the ECHR. Follow this policy for updates.

Don’t derogate from your duty to the details

Related policies

There's always room for debate

We’re serious about providing clear, up-to-date, non-partisan information. We focus on being consistent and fair in how we track policies, and always explain our reasoning. But there is always room for debate. So if you see it differently, we’d love you to tell us why or submit an edit.

Get involved!

Whether you are for or against this policy or just want to know more, it's never been easier to get involved and have your say. Try these for starters…

Join the discussion On this page, or Twitter, or Facebook. Democracy is better shared!
Follow this policy We'll send you email alerts every time something interesting happens.
Ask your MP Ask your MP to help you support or block this policy - write to them here.
Get the facts Sense about Science and Full Fact are great for evidence and fact checking.
Get ahead! The Simple Politics newsletter breaks it all down for you - before it happens!
Comments