play_circle_filled In progress

Health Health

Review support for children in need

Last updated: 01:15pm 6 June 2019

We will review support for children in need to understand why their outcomes are so poor and what more support they might require, in and out of school.

Conservative Party Manifesto 2017, p.73

Our verdict

As defined under Section 17 of the Children Act 1989, “children in need” are a category of children who are deemed to require assistance from a local authority due to risks to their development or health, or children who are disabled. The poor “outcomes” mentioned in this policy refer to educational outcomes, which are usually measured in terms of progress and attainment of pupils at school. This policy promises to review support for children in need and understand what might be done to improve those outcomes.

In March 2018, the government announced that it was reviewing support for children in need in order to learn more about appropriate practices to foster their success.

The review process has involved:

In December 2018, the interim findings of the review were published, outlining key points for action and next steps.

A second data analysis report was also published in December 2018 to “develop a stronger evidence base and understanding of what makes a difference to the educational outcomes”.

The government says the final part of the review will:

“consider what more government can do to incentivise, equip and support practitioners to realise the change we want to see.”

The promised review is well under way and a plan is in place for its completion. This is definitely ‘in progress’ and when the final review report is published we will be able to move this status to ‘done’. Follow this policy to stay up to date.

Review the facts

There's always room for debate

We’re serious about providing clear, up-to-date, non-partisan information. We focus on being consistent and fair in how we reach our verdicts, and always explain our reasoning. But there is always room for debate. So if you see it differently, we’d love you to tell us why. Or even better, submit an edit.