play_circle_filled In progress

Equalities and Rights Equalities and Rights

Set up a new Homeless Reduction Taskforce

Last updated: 10:57pm 27 November 2018

Our aim will be to halve rough sleeping over the course of the parliament and eliminate it altogether by 2027. To achieve this we will set up a new homelessness reduction taskforce that will focus on prevention and affordable housing, and we will pilot a Housing First approach to tackle rough sleeping.

Conservative Party Manifesto 2017, p.58

Our verdict

Since 2010 there has been a significant increase in declared homelessness with a 48% surge, as well as a 169% rise in individuals sleeping rough.

The Government has taken the initiative to reduce these numbers through the Homeless Reduction Act, launched on the 3rd of April 2018. Despite being an ambitious goal, the Act is projected to halve rough sleeping by 2022 and eliminate it by 2027. To support this a Homeless Reduction Taskforce will be established, whose role will be the creation and implementation of strategies aiming at achieving that goal.

There will be a substantial investment in the project with £1 billion promised and an additional £50 million aimed at “deliver[ing] an ‘end-to-end’ approach to homelessness and rough sleeping prevention” (4B). The Taskforce’s strategies will include support and housing for those in need, accompanied by health and drug-issue counseling.

As of 7th of March, the Taskforce has had its first meeting since its official establishment in December, despite initial fears regarding its effectiveness. However, while work is evidently in motion there is much more to do and it is only the beginning of a long and ambitious promise that needs to be monitored. Therefore the policy should be considered to be ‘in progress’.

For more detail: 

If you want to know more: 


There's always room for debate

We’re serious about providing clear, up-to-date, non-partisan information. We focus on being consistent and fair in how we reach our verdicts, and always explain our reasoning. But there is always room for debate. So if you see it differently, we’d love you to tell us why. Or even better, submit an edit.