Maintain commitment of 0.7 per cent of our gross national income on international aid and development
Last updated: 02:32pm 12 August 2019
Conservative Party Manifesto 2017, p.39
This is the right ambition for a country with a global outlook, so we will maintain the commitment to spend 0.7 per cent of our gross national income on assistance to developing nations and international emergencies.
The U.N implemented a threshold of 0.7% of Gross National Income (total of domestic and foreign output by residents of a country) on overseas development aid for all developed countries. Moreover, since 2015 the U.K legislation requires the government to allocate 0.7% of Gross National Income on foreign aid each year.
In the manifesto of 2017, the Conservative Party pledged to honour this requirement to provide assistance for developing countries.
According to the preliminary statistics, the U.K assigned 0.7% of its Gross National Income as part of the Official Development Assistance (ODA) for developing countries.
Additionally, the government provided £13,933 million which represents an increase of 4.2% (£555 million) since 2016.
Despite growing criticism urging to cut UK’s spending on aid for development – notably by the former foreign secretary and now Prime Minister, Boris Johnson – the government has successfully committed to spend 0.7% of gross national income for developing nations. Therefore, we can consider this promise as ‘done’.
Want to read more?
- Statistics on International Development – Gov.uk
- Reality check: How much does the UK spend on overseas aid? – BBC
- Boris Johnson calls for UK’s aid department to be closed – FT.com
- May to resist pressure to cut Britain’s foreign aid commitment – The Guardian
- Foreign aid to be shifted to support UK Policy, Johnson says – BBC
There's always room for debate
We’re serious about providing clear, up-to-date, non-partisan information. We focus on being consistent and fair in how we reach our verdicts, and always explain our reasoning. But there is always room for debate. So if you see it differently, we’d love you to tell us why. Or even better, submit an edit.