Spend £170 billion on housing, economic infrastructure and R&D during the next parliament
Last updated: 11:07am 29 October 2019
Conservative Party Manifesto 2017, p.20
The National Productivity Investment Fund will take total spending on housing, economic infrastructure and R&D to £170bn during the next parliament.
This policy is vast, encompassing spending on housing, economic infrastructure, research and development, as well as the National Productivity Investment Fund (NPIF). To reach a definitive verdict requires resources well beyond those available to us at Policy Tracker. Instead of short-changing readers with a combination of educated guesswork and insufficient research, we’re going to reach out to various organisations with greater expertise, deeper pockets and larger research teams.
We can say for certain that the size of the NPIF (a large fund which distributes monies to various programmes and initiatives) has grown twice since its inception, and in the 2018 Autumn Budget it was raised to £37 billion per year. [The 2019 Budget was recently postponed following government calls for a general election]
Based on the increase in the size of the NPIF, plus the fact that we can state with some confidence that the government is spending at least something on “housing, economic infrastructure and R&D”, we are rating this policy as ‘in progress’. We’ll be updating our verdict when we hear back from the organisations we’re asking for advice. Follow this policy to stay informed.
- The Allocation of Funding for Research and Innovation – Gov.uk
- Budget 2018 – Gov.uk
- Explore how government can do even more to support innovation
- Increase investment in research and development
- Invest in roads to support new housing and local growth
- Ensure there are homes for all
- Deliver growth across the country
- Upgrade our energy infrastructure in an affordable way
There's always room for debate
We’re serious about providing clear, up-to-date, non-partisan information. We focus on being consistent and fair in how we reach our verdicts, and always explain our reasoning. But there is always room for debate. So if you see it differently, we’d love you to tell us why. Or even better, submit an edit.